<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weight Watchers and Applebee&#8217;s Are Being Sued</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laaloosh.com/2009/07/31/weight-watchers-and-applebees-are-being-sued/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laaloosh.com/2009/07/31/weight-watchers-and-applebees-are-being-sued/</link>
	<description>Free Weight Watchers recipes, Online Points calculator, Printable Food Journal, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:21:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Annette</title>
		<link>http://www.laaloosh.com/2009/07/31/weight-watchers-and-applebees-are-being-sued/#comment-3456</link>
		<dc:creator>Annette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laaloosh.com/?p=2534#comment-3456</guid>
		<description>Interesting. In a way, it explains why Weight Watchers has been so anal retentive about making sure other people don&#039;t use their Points without permission. They probably didn&#039;t want a situation like this to arrive with unauthorized usage. Maybe they should have paid better attention to the people they were giving permission to use their Points. This certainly makes me doubt other products official branded with WW points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. In a way, it explains why Weight Watchers has been so anal retentive about making sure other people don&#8217;t use their Points without permission. They probably didn&#8217;t want a situation like this to arrive with unauthorized usage. Maybe they should have paid better attention to the people they were giving permission to use their Points. This certainly makes me doubt other products official branded with WW points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.laaloosh.com/2009/07/31/weight-watchers-and-applebees-are-being-sued/#comment-3450</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laaloosh.com/?p=2534#comment-3450</guid>
		<description>PS Got me a new domain for my yet to be fully developed website ... timothy&#039;s kitchen. http://www.timothyskitchen.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS Got me a new domain for my yet to be fully developed website &#8230; timothy&#8217;s kitchen. <a href="http://www.timothyskitchen.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.timothyskitchen.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.laaloosh.com/2009/07/31/weight-watchers-and-applebees-are-being-sued/#comment-3449</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laaloosh.com/?p=2534#comment-3449</guid>
		<description>So what am I to make of this? Is Ms. Curry a whiner? Are Applebee&#039;s and Weight Watchers weasels? Is Weight Watchers allowing Applebee&#039;s to post point and the WW logo based upon Applebee&#039;s claim of Nutritional Data? Is Weight Watchers negligent in checking those numbers or are they just willing dupes? How did Ms. Curry get the &quot;real&quot; numbers since Applebee&#039;s recipes are proprietary information?

If Applebee&#039;s can post faulty (if not outright fraudulent) Weight Watchers Points(c) (tm) Values, what&#039;s wrong with LaaLoosh.com posting accurate (and not outright fraudulent) Weight Watchers Points(c) (tm) Values? Who is harming Weight Watchers good name and the faith of their consumers more? LaaLoosh.com? or Applebee&#039;s?

I leave it to the gentle reader to answer that last question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what am I to make of this? Is Ms. Curry a whiner? Are Applebee&#8217;s and Weight Watchers weasels? Is Weight Watchers allowing Applebee&#8217;s to post point and the WW logo based upon Applebee&#8217;s claim of Nutritional Data? Is Weight Watchers negligent in checking those numbers or are they just willing dupes? How did Ms. Curry get the &#8220;real&#8221; numbers since Applebee&#8217;s recipes are proprietary information?</p>
<p>If Applebee&#8217;s can post faulty (if not outright fraudulent) Weight Watchers Points(c) &#8482; Values, what&#8217;s wrong with LaaLoosh.com posting accurate (and not outright fraudulent) Weight Watchers Points(c) &#8482; Values? Who is harming Weight Watchers good name and the faith of their consumers more? LaaLoosh.com? or Applebee&#8217;s?</p>
<p>I leave it to the gentle reader to answer that last question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
