Lemon Garlic Chicken

Ok, I admittedly have been obsessed with my crock pot recipes lately. But come on…who doesn’t love a good slow cooker recipe? They are fast and easy, and taste delicious! And this low calorie Lemon Garlic Chicken Recipe is truly one of the yummiest low calorie crock pot recipes I’ve tried. It’s zesty and tangy and full of fabulous garlicky flavor! And the best part, is that it’s so low in fat and calories, so each serving has just a 3 Point total! So if you are following the Weight Watchers plan, I’m thinking you’ll definitely appreciate this rockin’ Lemon Garlic Chicken Slow Cooker Recipe. Try serving this dish with a side of roasted veggies or one of my favorite 0 Point salads! Again, please note that this not an official Weight Watchers Chicken Recipe. :)

Lemon Garlic Chicken Crock Pot Recipe

Ingredients:
- 8 boneless skinless chicken breasts
- 10 garlic cloves, finely chopped or minced
- 2 yellow onions, chopped
- 2 cups fat free, low sodium chicken broth
- 1/4 cup lemon pepper seasoning
- 4 tbsp paprika
- 2 tbsp fresh parsley, finely chopped
- 1 tablespoon kosher salt
- 1 tsp lemon zest

Directions:
Rinse the chicken and pat dry. Mix together the lemon pepper seasoning, paprika and salt. Coat the chicken with the spice mixture. Place the coated chicken in the crock pot and cover with the fat free chicken broth, garlic cloves, parsley and onions and lemon zest. Cook on low heat for about 3-4 hours (or until done).

Entire recipe makes 8 servings
Serving size is 1 breast, with approx 4 tbsp of sauce
Each serving = 3 Point Total

Print This RecipePrint This Recipe

Please share this with friends:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email

GET MORE WEIGHT WATCHER RECIPES

Enter your email address to subscribe to LaaLoosh, Or subscribe to the RSS feed.

6 Responses to “Lemon Garlic Chicken Crock Pot Recipe – 3 Point Total”
  1. Missy says:

    Sounds Yummy!!!

  2. Kathi says:

    Saw this recipe and decided to try it. All day, both my husband and I looked forward to dinner time. Sadly, we were both disappointed in the flavor. Not exactly sure what I did wrong, as I followed the recipe exactly, which is something I rarely do. Not something we’ll have again.

    I am going to try the chicken cacciatore crock pot recipe next. Maybe I’ll have more luck with that.

  3. Maggie says:

    By trying this recipe myself. I think that the recipe should be 4 tsp of paprika rather than 4 tbsp. Taking a look at the picture again, didn’t look the same when I’ve made it.

  4. Lola says:

    I love this recipe but I’d like to know the recipe for the potatoes and vegetables that you show with the garlic chicken in the picture. Can you tell me how you cook them and what their point value is?

  5. LaaLoosh says:

    The potatoes that you see in the picture are just roasted red potatoes that have been roasted in the oven with a bit of non-fat cooking spray and salt. Then I served the lemon garlic chicken over them with some of the sauce. For the points value, it will depend on the amount of potatoes you use. According to Weight Watchers, 1 cup of cooked red potatoes is 2 Points. So if you add that to each serving, you’d be adding on 2 Points to each serving. Hope that helps!

  6. Emily says:

    I have to agree with earlier comments, mine looked nothing like the picture. I think the recipe calls for the wrong amount of paprika. I halved the recipe (4 chicken breasts instead of 8) and only put in 2 teaspoons of paprika instead of tablespoons, and the chicken still turned out bright red and very spicy. There was a hint of lemon in the aftertaste and you could tell that the onions had picked up the lemon flavoring. I also added a couple squirts of lemon juice to mine while it was cooking. Next time I might just eliminate the paprika from the recipe altogether.

Add Your Comments

TEPATH . '/sidebar.php'); if (get_option('mandigo_1024') && get_option('mandigo_3columns')) include (TEMPLATEPATH . '/sidebar2.php'); } } get_footer(); ?>